Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
The HP Omen X 27 1440p 240Hz gaming monitor has a fairly slim but sturdy design with ultra-thin bezels. It has a rather aggressive matte anti-glare screen coating, which some users may find too grainy, but it’s tolerable. HP Eye Ease with Eyesafe® certification keeps high-energy blue light out and the color accuracy in. Customize your comfort with the adjustable base. Believing is Seeing
When it comes to color reproduction, this monitor outperforms the competition. One of the most important aspects of this quality is the IPS that was designed for it. Indeed, out of all the monitors we tested in this price range, this one is unquestionably one of the finest IPS displays. Its materials are pretty great, its design is clean, and it has an ergonomic stand, all of which you won’t be finding pretty easy for the prices this monitor is costing right now. Connectors When compared to the standard GTG, the MPRT is preferable for competitive games. However, it does compromise a huge portion of the screen brightness, making the screen dimmer, and sometimes too much for normal use. So, unless you are really into competitive games and want the monitor to perform the best, I don’t recommend you keep this on. Of course, as with every manufacturer’s portfolio, there are a few unworthy models here and there, but in this instance, the decent monitors easily compensate for the duds. The first one I can’t suggest from this line is the HP X32c, which I explain why in my review of its non-curved variant. For response time performance, HP includes four overdrive settings with the X27q, the first of which is Level 1. This is your classic overdrive disabled setting. Response times are weak, at just 11.5ms when running the monitor at 165Hz, which causes a bit of a blur trail to appear behind moving objects.Live in the flow of 165 Hz with a super fast 1ms response time[1] and keep your gameplay smooth-as-silk with AMD[2] FreeSync™ Premium[3]. A Display of Responsibility This monitor has the same overall aesthetics as its 32-inch older brother, but it is smaller, measuring 24.15 x 20.17 x 8.33 inches and weighing 15.20 lbs. Because of its average size and lower weight, this one appeals to a wider audience, and it surely has the necessary to be mainstream. Rec. 2020 coverage is only 67%, which is only 5 percentage points better than sRGB-only displays like the PX277 Prime, and behind other monitors that target DCI-P3. I guess this is why HP didn't advertise a wide color gamut, it straddles the middle between standard and wide. Default Color Performance
There are four response time overdrive modes: Normal, Fast, Faster, Fastest. We recommend using either ‘Fast’ or ‘Faster,’ as ‘Fastest’ introduces a lot of pixel overshoot. La calidad de imagen es buena, con una resolución Full HD que se adapta muy bien a sus dimensiones. Es rápido, panel IPS con 1ms GtG, 165Hz y AMD Freesync. Además cuenta con puerto DisplayPort y HDMI 2.0, por lo que la velocidad es muy buena para juegos de acción. Sus ángulos de visión son buenos y su colorimetría muy realista (99% de sRGB está muy bien). Su brillo es alto, superando a la media de la gama que suelen tener 250 nits. En el caso del HP X27 posee 400 nits. No obstante, al igual que le ocurre a otros paneles IPS, el contraste es mejorable. What’s more, since there are only 16 dimming zones, they cannot quite keep up with fast-moving objects, which will introduce noticeable trailing/glowing. So, for fast-paced gaming, make sure local dimming is disabled.Overall, this monitor does not offer the most premium features available for gaming displays, but for its present costs, it is more than adequate to provide you with a superb and seamless gaming experience. Image Overall Quality Out of the box, greyscale performance is average. The X27q ended up a bit too warm, and the gamma was too high, making some shades darker than they should be. This caused weak deltaE performance. The modes higher than Level 2 are pretty unusable due to high levels of overshoot. While response performance does improve, overshoot gets significantly worse, especially in the Level 4 mode, and it's here you'll see massive inverse ghost trails behind moving objects. These modes are only included so HP can claim the monitor has a 1ms response time - which it can achieve, just with insane and unusable levels of overshoot. The response time speed is top-notch as well; you won’t encounter any prominent ghosting or trailing behind fast-moving objects. To top it off, this display wouldn’t be complete without a solid tearing-reduction function, which the AMD FreeSync Premium provided. The premium version of FreeSync has a wider operating range, which means you’ll get even better results with tear-free visuals and better smoothness.
Maximum brightness is good, at a touch under 400 nits, which is what HP advertises. Most budget monitors of this class get around this bright, which is sufficient for indoor usage in most conditions. Minimum brightness is also solid at 43 nits, great for users in darker conditions. Either way, we recommend considering the Samsung Odyssey G7 or the ASUS XG27AQM at this price range instead. We are pretty impressed with how HP has been able to make this sort of monitor with only a bit of fat trimmed around the edges. We lose a bit of wide gamut here, a bit of performance there, we don't get a directional toggle for the OSD, and so on. But the basics are intact, like how we still get a height adjustable stand, and how the gaming experience still holds up well compared to other monitors we've tested with the same specs. What we're left with is the monitor being unable to provide a single overdrive mode experience. This is pretty typical for a budget monitor, we don't expect perfect overdrive optimization here, it's a standard area of compromise as integrating features like variable overdrive would increase the cost. In any case, even if you simply need the monitor to play, I don’t advocate VA panels at all. If you’re that competitive, I recommend looking for an inexpensive Fast IPS monitor that provides all of the benefits of an IPS screen while having better or similar response times as VA monitors.The only way to significantly improve performance is through a full calibration, we used Calman for this, and achieved really solid results for sRGB. However for wider gamuts like DCI-P3, coverage of this gamut simply isn't good enough, so I wouldn't recommend this display for anything other than sRGB. Calibrated Color Performance In accordance with the Microsoft Silicon Support Policy, HP does not support or provide drivers for Windows 8 or Windows 7 on products configured with Intel or AMD 7th generation and forward processor
They managed to adopt one of the highest brightness ratios for this monitor while keeping the pricing relatively stable, resulting in an improved price-performance ratio. With 400 nits, you’ll be able to get an edge during games by seeing your opponent easier in a dark place. Fortunately, this monitor has the same above-average quality materials as its 32-inch counterpart. Those do convey a high level of durability, which is noteworthy given the monitor’s low price point. They also opted to utilize an ergonomic stand for this model, as if quality materials weren’t enough for such a “budget” screen.
In accordance with the Microsoft Silicon Support Policy, HP does not support or provide drivers for Windows 8 or Windows 7 on products configured with Intel or AMD 7th generation and forward processors You get the perfect pixel-per-inch ratio of ~108 PPI (pixels per inch), resulting in vivid and crisp details as well as plenty of screen real estate without having to use any scaling.
Great Deal 
New Comment